Friday, 07th May 2021

   home     about     authors     news     books     sitemap     privacy     contact us

There are 9 users online

add to favorites
make home page

Book changes
Email correspondence
General Community News
Historical perspectives
Letters on topic
Personal recollections
Public statements
Scholastic views
Site Statistics
Srila Prabhupada vani
Voices! - Letters (active link)

Voices! - Letters

Our Newsletter

  Srila Prabhupada said:

"Srila Vyasadeva revealed these statements after perfect realization and therefore they are perfect, for liberated sages like Vyasadeva never commit errors in their rhetorical arrangements. Unless one accepts this fact, there is no use in trying to obtain help from the revealed scriptures."  -- CC Adi-Lila Chapter 2 text 86 purport.

"If you concoct, 'I am more intelligent than my Guru,' 'I can make additions and alterations,' then you are finished." -- Srila Prabhupada lecture July 12, 1975 Philadelphia Pa.

"We cannot water down the philosophy to make it more palatable. Our books must remain as they are." -- Srila Prabhupada letter to Lilavati devi dasi March 31, 1977.


  Notable Quotes:

Jasomatinandan prabhu:  " ... commonsense dictates that except for typographical mistakes such as "planet of the trees," no editions and subtractions should be done from 1972 edition."



The Conclusions are the Same?
Author: Hasti Gopal Das
Added: 02/14/2007
Type: Summary
Viewed: 6643 time(s)
Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10Average visitor rating of 9/10

How would you rate this article:    Bad Good   Go » 

The original 1972 Gita is faulty?

The other day a devotee friend of mine gave me a 1998 copy of a magazine entitled "Responsible Publishing: Why and How the BBT Publishes Revisions of Srila Prabhupada's Books."  On the front cover below the bottom of a photo showing Srila Prabhupada translating it says, "The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International Inc."

The issue of the changing of Srila Prabhupada's books is an on going issue and I will not labour over it here. I am not a scholar by any means, but personally I believe the issue has been settled and won by those scholars who believe as I do, that the vast changes and indeed the continuing changes and published changed books are unnecessary and a waste of time and vast resources.

If the BBTI will say that their 1982 version is as identical to Srila Prabhupada's original version in regards to conclusions, spiritual potency and effectiveness on world societies then this must be proven to those scholars who challenge them that their version does not. A very daunting task for sure and one they must answer to as they are the ones saying that the original 1972 Gita is faulty.

Suppose a teacher gives the student an addition of numbers adding to the total of 18 using the numbers 3 plus 6 plus 9 in that order. The original numbers in the order given are to be accepted as they are, as well as the conclusion. One may change the number of numbers and the numbers themselves even using fractions, but the conclusion must be the same. For example, one may change the numbers of the original formula to 1 plus 2 plus 1 plus 3 plus 2 plus 9 equaling 18. Fair enough, the conclusion in the changed mathematical set up is the same. The question is why change it? The process or work done to change the formula in order to reach the same conclusion is a waste of time and resources if one is sincerely wanting to present the original conclusion and be faithful to the original teacher and his work.

For the sake of argument let's accept the fact that the BBTI's revised edition is better in relation to the language of the original, that spelling mistakes have been corrected, that certain words have been retranslated from enhanced recordings, and so on. However they must agree that their changed version must reach the same conclusion, have the same spiritual potency and effectiveness on world societies as the as the original 1972 edition, meaning that they are being faithful to the original teacher and his work. That being so then again, why change the original formula in order to come to the original conclusion as the original?

The original Srimad Bhagavatam in its' Preface says "The reading matter is so arranged with its original Sanskrit text, its English transliteration, synonyms, translation and purports so that one is sure to become a God-realized soul at the end of finishing the first nine cantos." If the BBTI is sure that the changes to their revised Bhagavatams are correct and bona fide, then they must agree that the above conclusion in Srila Prabhupada's original pre-1978 version should exist in their revised edition. If so, then why change the original, unless there is no interest in sharing the original conclusion.

That has been done before throughout history. I suspect that tens of millions of dollars have been spent over the years to change and reprint Srila Prabhupada's original pre-1978 books. Then there were the countless hours and staff to do all the work to in the end, REACH THE SAME CONCLUSION AS THE ORIGINALS? Could it be that what has simply taken place after 1978 has been a massive make work project in order to justify positions and profits? After all, the conclusions are the same… or are they?

Article Pages:  1  

Support Material

There is no support material available for this article.

Related Links

There are no related links for this article.

Forum Link

There is no forum link available for this article.

Related Books

There are no related books available for this article.

  Article Comments   Add Comment | View All (0)
    There are currently no comments for this article.

Click to contact "Books are the basis."